Disruptive Proactivity

The call is going well so far, but there are up to 60 slots in total, and so there’s plenty of space available.

Open Tech 2009 is an informal, low cost, one-day conference on
slightly different approaches to technology, democracy and community.
Thanks to 4IP for sponsoring what promises to be a day of thoughtful
talks and conversations with friends.

*What do we need?*
– Proposals from people who want to give a presentation, run a panel,
organise a tutorial, or run a demo of something new and interesting
on something that they think matters or getting people to help.

– Publicity – please blog this announcement, write a newspaper article,
forward to mailing lists, and tell your friends!

What topics do we hope to cover?
– Mashups, open data and security
– Disaster politics and technology
– Future of media distribution
– Community engagement
– Democracy 2.0
– Highlights, lowlights and lessons learnt
– Long term thinking on big problems and massive opportunities
– Tutorials & Workshops – share what you know

– If you’ve got an interesting proposal that doesn’t fit into any of
the categories above, please send it in anyway!

What have we already got talks or sessions about?
– ID, surveillance and data-sharing
– mySociety
– international disaster management technologies

We’re still looking for more talks on all our topics,
so if you want to offer something, we’re waiting to
hear your ideas.

*How do I submit a proposal?*
– Online form via http://www.ukuug.org/events/opentech2009/offer
– Deadline for submissions is midnight on Saturday 1st May 2009

*Can I buy or reserve a ticket to the event?*

– Register at http://www.ukuug.org/events/opentech2009/list
and we’ll email you nearer the time with more information

*Any other questions?*

Read the Submission page or email opentech@ukuug.org

More information at http://www.ukuug.org/events/opentech2009/

Congratulations to Direct Gov on launching innovate.direct.gov.uk. Launched at govbarcamp with one blog post, and claims of promise. Small steps to start with, but that’s ok.

Then it started snowing, and various public services started to not work very well any more.
Tom Watson MP registered www.schoolclosures.org.uk, and called on someone to build a mashup.
Directgov stepped up and took a swing. As an aside, the fact that a Minister of the Crown would make that call shows just how far some have come. More impressively, Directgov did very well.

The intial prototype was greated with adulation on the web. As it should be. Not only was it usable, it was developed fast, and well by an organisation with a reputation for only being able to do the opposite. So there was only one direction it could go from there. Maybe they’re not as directionless as we sometime claim…

On the 5th January, a message appeared that “The alpha prototype is offline at the moment for maintenance.”. Which is fine. it’s an alpha of a prototype. Not a full service. And a second version appeared buried in directgov which forwarded people off to the local authority sites which have that information. But it was still snowing and people had the URL. 6 days later, the “alpha prototype” address is still showing that page.

An update appeared earlier today. There is only one point in bold there, and it shows just how completely the people who seem to have taken it over on day 2 missed the point (that, or the original team got hit by a snowball and had all the clue knocked out of them).

But to recap, we have one site at schoolclosures.org.uk which has the label “alpha prototype” and is probably permanently closed, and a second, working service which is buried within the directgov monolith. If you can find it (good luck with that), it’s reasonable. Nothing flashy, but once you can figure out where it is (which is quite hard), it does the job.

So why didn’t directgov point schoolclosures at the new page (great URL of http://local.direct.gov.uk/LDGRedirect/index.jspLGSL=1140&LGIL;=8&ServiceName;=Find+out+about+emergency+school+closures). They said they did this, but that’s just plain not true. They just didn’t do the simple and obvious step of pointing people who knew of the prototype at the service. Of course, if you follow the directgov groupthink, it doesn’t matter that it’s buried, as people will look through the site for lots of detail. A nice URL doesn’t matter (to them).

As a result, the big bold text shows that they have so far done one thing: learnt the wrong lesson.

Directgov should be happy that people were talking about their service, and if it isn’t wasn’t clearly stated that it’s an alpha prototype jut fix the labelling because the only people who matter are those who look at the site.. As a bit of help with that, the fact that it had a tag of “beta” might have been a source of some of the confusion.

But they got comments and feedback; hopefully they’ll figure out why people made those comments before using them as justification for doing something that follows their own processes and prejudices at the expense of a useful service. While it might be extremely unlikely, so is the fact that the first iteration of schoolclosures.org.uk existed at all.

This should be considered a large success for directgov. Maybe they’ll just call it a cockup instead of realising what a decent online service they had for their users, then decided to turn off.

Apparently, they’re going to bring it back “imminently” after addressing comments. Good luck with that.

On an unrelated note, it’s exactly 2 years since we lost Chris Lightfoot, I do wonder what he would have said about, well, everything really. RIP Chris. We still miss you.